Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1507309

Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for IMXv2 PWM

From Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for IMXv2 PWM
Date 2016-10-24 17:30 +0200
Message-ID <svPmi-ZI-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <svyY9-6no-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <svyY9-6no-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:45:44 +0200
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl> wrote:

> This commit provides apply() callback implementation for IMX's PWMv2.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index f3577c5..df25379 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -171,6 +171,84 @@ static void imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_pwm_apply_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +			    struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +	unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale;
> +	struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> +	struct pwm_state cstate;
> +	unsigned long long c;
> +	u32 cr = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
> +
> +	c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per);
> +	c *= state->period;
> +
> +	do_div(c, 1000000000);
> +	period_cycles = c;
> +
> +	prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1;
> +
> +	period_cycles /= prescale;
> +	c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * state->duty_cycle;
> +	do_div(c, state->period);
> +	duty_cycles = c;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * according to imx pwm RM, the real period value should be
> +	 * PERIOD value in PWMPR plus 2.
> +	 */
> +	if (period_cycles > 2)
> +		period_cycles -= 2;
> +	else
> +		period_cycles = 0;
> +
> +	/* Enable the clock if the PWM is being enabled. */
> +	if (state->enabled && !cstate.enabled) {
> +		ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Wait for a free FIFO slot if the PWM is already enabled, and flush
> +	 * the FIFO if the PWM was disabled and is about to be enabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (cstate.enabled)
> +		imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(chip, pwm);
> +	else if (state->enabled)
> +		imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip);
> +
> +	writel(duty_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSAR);
> +	writel(period_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMPR);
> +
> +	cr |= MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(prescale) |
> +	      MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN | MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN |
> +	      MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN | MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH;
> +
> +	if (state->enabled)
> +		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
> +
> +	if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
> +
> +	writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> +
> +	/* Disable the clock if the PWM is being disabled. */
> +	if (!state->enabled && cstate.enabled)
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> +
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  		struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
>  {
> @@ -322,6 +400,7 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
>  	.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
>  	.set_polarity = imx_pwm_set_polarity,
>  	.config = imx_pwm_config,
> +	.apply = imx_pwm_apply_v2,
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 4/6] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for IMXv2 PWM Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl> - 2016-10-24 00:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for IMXv2 PWM Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-10-24 17:30 +0200

csiph-web