Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1507329

Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test

From Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test
Date 2016-10-24 17:50 +0200
Message-ID <svPFE-17R-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <svMy5-7xJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <svMHM-7B9-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <svMHM-7B9-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <svNu9-87q-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <svOzU-lR-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -1257,7 +1257,14 @@ static u32 perf_event_pid(struct perf_event *event, struct task_struct *p)
>  	if (event->parent)
>  		event = event->parent;
>  
> -	return task_tgid_nr_ns(p, event->ns);
> +	/*
> +	 * It is possible the task already got unhashed, in which case we
> +	 * cannot determine the current->group_leader/real_parent.
> +	 *
> +	 * Also, report -1 to indicate unhashed, so as not to confused with
> +	 * 0 for the idle task.
> +	 */
> +	return pid_alive(p) ? task_tgid_nr_ns(p, event->ns) : ~0;
>  }

Yes, but this _looks_ racy unless p == current. I mean, pid_alive() makes
task_tgid_nr_ns() safe, but task_tgid_nr_ns() still can return zero _if_
it can race with the exiting task.

>  static u32 perf_event_tid(struct perf_event *event, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -1268,7 +1275,7 @@ static u32 perf_event_tid(struct perf_event *event, struct task_struct *p)
>  	if (event->parent)
>  		event = event->parent;
>
> -	return task_pid_nr_ns(p, event->ns);
> +	return pid_alive(p) ? task_pid_nr_ns(p, event->ns) : ~0;

The same.

However. At first glance the only case when p != current is copy_process(),
right? And in this case the new child can't go away. So I think this patch
is fine.

Oleg.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 12:00 +0200
  Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 13:20 +0200
    Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 13:30 +0200
      Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 13:40 +0200
        Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 14:10 +0200
          Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 14:20 +0200
    Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 13:30 +0200
      Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 14:10 +0200
        Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 14:20 +0200
          Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 14:30 +0200
            Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 14:40 +0200
              Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 15:30 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 15:50 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 16:20 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 16:40 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 17:50 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 18:00 +0200
                RE: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test "Ni, BaoleX" <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-10-25 09:00 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-25 11:30 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-25 16:50 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-26 11:10 +0200
                Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-26 18:20 +0200
            Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 14:40 +0200
        Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 14:20 +0200
    Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 14:20 +0200
      Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-24 14:30 +0200
      Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 14:30 +0200

csiph-web