Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1504939
| From | Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower |
| Date | 2016-10-20 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sumFH-pD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <stiEa-5Hd-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sujou-6KH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sumw1-mk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sumw1-mk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 04:20:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >> > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 09:41:34 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 06:59:35 PM Jörg Otte wrote: >> >> >> 2016-10-19 17:29 GMT+02:00 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>: >> >> >> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Additional info: I usally use schedutil governor. >> >> >> >> If I switch to performance governor problems go away. >> >> >> >> Maybe a cpufreq problem? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Oh, I completely misread the original bug report, and then didn't read >> >> >> > your confirmation email right. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I thought you had a slower build of the different kernels (when >> >> >> > building on the same kernel), and that the _build_ itself had slowed >> >> >> > down for some reason. But you're actually saying that doing the _same_ >> >> >> > build actually takes longer when running on 4.9-rc1. >> >> >> >> >> >> Exactly! >> >> >> >> >> >> Btw: ondemand governor is also good. >> >> >> >> >> >> > There are a few small cpufreq changes there in between commit >> >> >> > 29fbff8698fc (that you reported was fine - please tell me I got _that_ >> >> >> > right, at least?) and 4.9-rc1. >> >> >> >> >> >> Perfect! That's what I mean. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Adding Rafael to the cc. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > That said, none of them look all that likely to me. It *would* be good >> >> >> > if you could bisect it a bit (perhaps not fully, but a couple of >> >> >> > bisection steps to narrow down what area it is). >> >> >> >> >> >> I try that tomorrow. >> >> > >> >> > Well, please try commit ef98988ba369 (Merge tag 'pm-extra-4.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm) which is the >> >> > merge introducing the late cpufreq changes. If the issue is there, please >> >> > try to revert commit 899bb6642f2a (cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching >> >> > the frequency) which is the only cpufreq one that may matter for the schedutil >> >> > governor (and I have one fix for that commit queued up already). >> >> > >> >> >> >> Is "cpufreq: fix overflow in cpufreq_table_find_index_dl()" the fix >> >> you are speaking of? >> >> >> >> Fixes: 899bb6642f2a (cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency) >> > >> > Yes. >> > >> >> If yes, can you add a hint in the commit message describing the impact >> >> like here a slow-down of building a linux-kernel. >> >> With a reference to this ML-thread? >> > >> > I will if that turns out to be the case. >> > >> >> I have tried the revert and the patch from Sergey Senozhatsk pending >> in linux-pm.git#linux-next. >> Both fixes the issue for me. > > OK, thanks for the confirmation! > >> Feel free to give appropriate credits and many thanks to Jörg. >> >> I tried 'make -j3' in my last build and it was approx. 5mins faster in >> my customized setup. >> Will switch back to 2 parallel-make-jobs - it's safer for me. >> >> Can you explain why this issue was not seen when building under Linux v4.8.x? >> [1] says... >> Cc: 4.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.8+ > > The commit in question might not make it into 4.8.y yet. > It's a bit terrifying to see these impacts of schedutil cpufreq-governor. Do you have a test-case or how do you test with / for schedutil? - sed@ -
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 03:40 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:40 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 19:00 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-10-18 19:20 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-10-19 17:30 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 19:00 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-10-19 22:50 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 09:50 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-10-20 13:10 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-10-20 16:30 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 16:40 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-10-20 16:50 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 03:00 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 16:30 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 10:00 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 10:10 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-10-20 13:10 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 16:40 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-10-20 16:50 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 09:30 +0200
Re: [4.9-rc1] Build-time 2x slower Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 09:50 +0200
csiph-web