Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1504887
| From | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM |
| Date | 2016-10-20 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sulzX-84O-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <stfdf-3r0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <su0vw-2D0-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <su0Fe-2Wq-99@gated-at.bofh.it> <su18f-37s-77@gated-at.bofh.it> <sucZI-2zP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:08:14PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Fair point, what about leaving those as they are, and also adding > them to asm-prototypes.h protected with GENKSYMS ifdef? It's not > beautiful, but still better than armksyms.c before Al's patches (or > at least no worse). I disagree (also see below). The armksyms way was understandable. The new way... I've no idea yet, because I wasn't even copied on any of the patches. I've no idea how the exports are now handled. I'm in a black hole with respect to that, and that's now a problem. > > Now, it would have _ALSO_ been nice to have been at least COPIED on the > > original set of changes that caused the need for this change. I wasn't. > > So I want to see the original set of changes reverted, because they're > > clearly causing breakage. Let's revert them and then go through the > > proper process of maintainer review, rather than bypassing maintainers > > and screwing up architectures in the process. There really is no > > excuse for this crap. > > You may have a point about improvement of the process. I wasn't > involved in the original patches, but we did cc linux-arch when the > .S CRC issue became known. Yes, but I'm not on linux-kernel-v2, and I've no desire to end up with another list I've no hope of keeping up with to my mailbox - I'll just ignore it. 99% of the messages on it at the time when vger kicked me off the list was x86 related discussion, and not really cross-arch issues. As I say, it just became another linux-kernel list. > However let's work on the assumption that they won't be reverted at this > stage, and try to come up with something to fix it that you're happy with. Well, there's more problems with this new KSYMS approach than just the CRCs. It forces a rebuild of the ksyms files every single time, which then causes a relink of the kernel: CHK include/config/kernel.release GEN ./Makefile CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h Using /home/rmk/git/linux-rmk as source for kernel CHK include/generated/timeconst.h CHK include/generated/bounds.h CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h CALL /home/rmk/git/linux-rmk/scripts/checksyscalls.sh - due to target missing CHK include/generated/compile.h EXPORTS arch/arm/lib/lib-ksyms.o - due to lib-ksyms.o not in $(targets) LD arch/arm/lib/built-in.o - due to: arch/arm/lib/lib-ksyms.o EXPORTS lib/lib-ksyms.o - due to lib-ksyms.o not in $(targets) LD lib/built-in.o - due to: lib/lib-ksyms.o LD vmlinux.o MODPOST vmlinux.o - due to vmlinux.o not in $(targets) GEN .version CHK include/generated/compile.h UPD include/generated/compile.h CC init/version.o - due to: include/generated/compile.h LD init/built-in.o - due to: init/version.o KSYM .tmp_kallsyms1.o KSYM .tmp_kallsyms2.o LD vmlinux SORTEX vmlinux SYSMAP System.map OBJCOPY arch/arm/boot/Image - due to: vmlinux Building modules, stage 2. Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready LZO arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy_data - due to: arch/arm/boot/compressed/../Image MODPOST 689 modules - due to target is PHONY AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.o - due to: arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy_data LD arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux - due to: arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.o OBJCOPY arch/arm/boot/zImage - due to: arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux Kernel: arch/arm/boot/zImage is ready -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 09:10 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2016-10-17 12:10 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-10-17 13:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 13:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 13:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Mathieu OTHACEHE <m.othacehe@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 14:30 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2016-10-18 02:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 03:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-10-19 16:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 06:00 +0200
[PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-17 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-19 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-10-19 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-10-20 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-10-20 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-10-22 22:00 +0200
[PATCH 2/2, variant A] ARM: add hidden mmioset/mmiocpy prototypes Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-24 17:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/2, variant B] ARM: move mmiocpy/mmioset exports to io.c Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-24 17:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-24 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-24 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-10-20 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-10-20 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-10-20 10:30 +0200
csiph-web