Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1505934
| From | Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: governors: Move the files to the upper directory |
| Date | 2016-10-21 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suI3w-63W-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <soOY1-67p-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <soOY1-67p-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <suHqN-5zP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <suHTP-60l-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <suI3w-63W-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:22:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Lezcano > <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:47:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Lezcano > >> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > Currently the different governors are stored in the subdir > >> > 'governors'. That is not a problem. > >> > > >> > However, that forces to declare some private structure in the > >> > include/linux/cpuidle.h header because these governor files > >> > don't have access to the private 'cpuidle.h' located in > >> > drivers/cpuidle. > >> > > >> > Instead of having the governors in the separate directory, move > >> > them along with the drivers and prefix them with 'governor-', > >> > that allows to do a proper cleanup in the cpuidle headers. > >> > >> While I'm not particularly against this change, I'm sort of wondering > >> about the reason. > >> > >> What in particular would be wrong with doing > >> > >> #include "../cpuidle.h" > >> > >> in a governor .c file? > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > there is nothing wrong by doing this relative inclusion. It is an alternative > > to the proposed patch. I personally don't like relative inclusion but it is > > a matter of taste and I am perfectly fine to resend the patch by just moving > > the structure to the private header and change the inclusion. > > > > On the other side, the cpufreq susbsytem has all the governors along with the > > drivers in the same directory, so perhaps it makes sense to have a similar files > > organization. > > > > Actually, I'm fine with both approaches. Up to you to decide. > > I'm thinking let's keep the code where it is in case people depend on > the current location somehow (ie. have patches out of the tree or > similar). We can still move it later if need be. Ok, I will resend the patch [2/2] by moving the structure from the exported header to the private header and add the relative inclusion path. Thanks. -- Daniel
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: governors: Move the files to the upper directory "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-10-21 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: governors: Move the files to the upper directory Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-10-21 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: governors: Move the files to the upper directory Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-10-21 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: governors: Move the files to the upper directory "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-10-21 15:30 +0200
csiph-web