Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1505687
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: FRV-setup: Clarification for "source code clean-up"? |
| Date | 2016-10-21 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suEjh-3AW-85@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <suAfD-16j-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <suApj-1a2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <suCr8-2ns-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <suCUa-2xD-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <suE9B-3xe-69@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:11:54AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > It's all about ratios... Each clean up patch has chance of introducing > > a bug. > > Each update suggestion contains a possibility for mistakes. > Yes. But bug fix patches make up for it by fixing stuff. > > > If you only send clean up patches then you only introduce bugs. > > I find such a conclusion questionable with the wording "only". > How are you going to fix bugs if you only send clean ups? > > > We really don't want people sending patches if they introduce more bugs > > than they fix. > > How do you think about to discuss corresponding software development > statistics in more detail? I think normal developers should fix 10 bugs or add a few features for every regression they introduce. I introduced a regression just last week, so that's a normal part of life, but I was at least *trying* to fix a bug when I did it. regards, dan carpenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/6] FRV-setup: Fine-tuning for six function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 07:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/6] FRV-setup: Use seq_putc() in show_cpuinfo() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 07:10 +0200
[PATCH 3/6] FRV-setup: Add some spaces for better code readability SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 07:10 +0200
[PATCH 5/6] FRV-setup: Fix indentation in two lines SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] FRV-setup: Fix indentation in two lines Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-10-21 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] FRV-setup: Fix indentation in two lines Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-10-21 10:00 +0200
Re: FRV-setup: Clarification for "source code clean-up"? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 11:20 +0200
Re: FRV-setup: Clarification for "source code clean-up"? Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-10-21 11:30 +0200
Re: FRV-setup: Clarification for "source code clean-up"? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 12:00 +0200
Re: FRV-setup: Clarification for "source code clean-up"? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-10-21 12:30 +0200
Re: FRV-setup: Clarification for "source code clean-up"? Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-10-21 12:30 +0200
Re: FRV-setup: Clarification for "source code clean-up"? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-21 13:10 +0200
Re: Improving software around DMA API usage? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 13:40 +0200
[PATCH 6/6] FRV-setup: Move statements for "case" to separate lines SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-21 07:20 +0200
csiph-web