Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()

From	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()
Date	2016-10-21 09:00 +0200
Message-ID	<suBY5-1YC-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sut4t-4yl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sutea-4By-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <suv6i-5OV-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Please wait for a full review and do not send out patches 5 seconds after
> > the first mail hits your inbox.
> 
> Since you had previously commented on patch 1 and had already
> commented on patch 2, I presumed you were done reviewing, but I was
> obviously in error.  My apologies.

No problem. As a general rule you should not send updates like a machine
gun. That issue is years old, so there is no rush to fix it just because
some random (probably out of tree) code trips over it.

Thanks,

	tglx

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process() Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-20 23:30 +0200
  [PATCH v4 2/2] timers: Fix documentation for schedule_timeout() and similar Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-20 23:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of  wake_up_process() Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-20 23:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process() Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-21 01:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of  wake_up_process() Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-21 09:00 +0200

csiph-web