Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1502852
| From | Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path |
| Date | 2016-10-18 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <stzlD-8kr-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <stx0t-70j-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:12:45PM +0800, zhouxianrong@huawei.com wrote: > From: z00281421 <z00281421@notesmail.huawei.com> > > bdi flusher may enter page alloc slow path due to writepage and kmalloc. > in that case the flusher as a direct reclaimer should not be throttled here > because it can not to reclaim clean file pages or anaonymous pages > for next moment; furthermore writeback rate of dirty pages would be > slow down and other direct reclaimers and kswapd would be affected. > bdi flusher should be iosceduled by get_request rather than here. > > Signed-off-by: z00281421 <z00281421@notesmail.huawei.com> What does this patch do that PF_LESS_THROTTLE is not doing already if there is an underlying BDI? There have been a few patches like this recently that look like they might do something useful but are subtle. They really should be accompanied by a test case and data showing they either fix a functional issue (machine livelocking due to writeback not making progress) or a performance issue. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2016-10-18 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-10-18 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2016-10-18 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path zhouxianrong <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2016-10-18 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-10-18 13:50 +0200
[PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> - 2016-10-20 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-10-20 15:30 +0200
csiph-web