Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1499447

MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes

From Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes
Date 2016-10-12 11:30 +0200
Message-ID <sro1j-2kL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

We have the following function policy_zonelist() which selects a zonelist
during various allocation paths. With this, general user space allocations
(IIUC might not have __GFP_THISNODE) fails while trying to get memory from
a memory only node without CPUs as the application runs some where else
and that node is not part of the nodemask. Why we insist on __GFP_THISNODE ?
On any memory only node its likely that the local node "nd" might not be
part of the nodemask, hence does it make sense to pick up the first node of
the nodemask in those cases without looking for __GFP_THISNODE ?

/* Return a zonelist indicated by gfp for node representing a mempolicy */
static struct zonelist *policy_zonelist(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy,
	int nd)
{
	switch (policy->mode) {
	case MPOL_PREFERRED:
		if (!(policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL))
			nd = policy->v.preferred_node;
		break;
	case MPOL_BIND:
		/*
		 * Normally, MPOL_BIND allocations are node-local within the
		 * allowed nodemask.  However, if __GFP_THISNODE is set and the
		 * current node isn't part of the mask, we use the zonelist for
		 * the first node in the mask instead.
		 */
		if (unlikely(gfp & __GFP_THISNODE) &&
				unlikely(!node_isset(nd, policy->v.nodes)))
			nd = first_node(policy->v.nodes);
		break;
	default:
		BUG();
	}
	return node_zonelist(nd, gfp);
}

- Anshuman

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-12 11:30 +0200
  Re: MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-10-12 11:50 +0200
    Re: MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-12 12:40 +0200
      Re: MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-10-12 13:10 +0200
    Re: MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-10-12 15:20 +0200

csiph-web