Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1499315
| From | Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ACPI: fix the process flow for 0 which return from acpi_register_gsi |
| Date | 2016-10-12 04:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <srh9v-6ic-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <srgwN-5Oo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016/10/12 9:20, MaJun wrote:
> The return value 0 from acpi_register_gsi() means irq mapping failed.
> So, we should process this case in else branch.
>
> Signed-off-by: MaJun <majun258@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/resource.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> index 56241eb..9918326 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 gsi,
>
> res->flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable);
> irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, gsi, triggering, polarity);
> - if (irq >= 0) {
> + if (irq > 0) {
On x86 or IA64, irq 0 is a valid irq number as far as I know.
Thanks
Hanjun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ACPI: fix the process flow for 0 which return from acpi_register_gsi MaJun <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-10-12 03:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH] ACPI: fix the process flow for 0 which return from acpi_register_gsi Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-10-12 04:10 +0200
csiph-web