Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1499190

[PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node

From Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node
Date 2016-10-11 22:30 +0200
Message-ID <srbQu-2QB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

We had some problems with pages getting unmapped in single threaded
affinitized processes. It was tracked down to NUMA scanning.

In this case it doesn't make any sense to unmap pages if the
process is single threaded and the page is already on the
node the process is running on.

Add a check for this case into the numa protection code,
and skip unmapping if true.

In theory the process could be migrated later, but we
will eventually rescan and unmap and migrate then.

In theory this could be made more fancy: remembering this
state per process or even whole mm. However that would
need extra tracking and be more complicated, and the
simple check seems to work fine so far.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 mm/mprotect.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index a4830f0325fe..e8028658e817 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 				/* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
 				if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
 					continue;
+
+				/*
+				 * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
+				 * a single-threaded process is running on.
+				 */
+				if (atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users) == 1 &&
+				    cpu_to_node(raw_smp_processor_id()) == page_to_nid(page))
+					continue;
 			}
 
 			ptent = ptep_modify_prot_start(mm, addr, pte);
-- 
2.5.5

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-10-11 22:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right  node Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-10-12 08:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right  node Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-12 17:50 +0200

csiph-web