Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1500482
| From | Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node |
| Date | 2016-10-13 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <srSC6-71Q-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sruq5-6PD-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <srJIt-152-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> > do {
> > oldpte = *pte;
> > @@ -94,6 +100,13 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> > /* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
> > if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
> > continue;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
> > + * a single-threaded process is running on.
> > + */
> > + if (target_node == page_to_nid(page))
> > + continue;
> > }
> >
>
> Check target_node != NUMA_NODE && target_node == page_to_nid(page) to
> avoid unnecessary page->flag masking and shifts?
I didn't do this last change because I expect a potentially mispredicted
check is more expensive than some shifting/masking.
-Andi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-10-12 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-10-13 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-13 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-10-13 20:20 +0200
csiph-web