Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1499129
| From | Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula |
| Date | 2016-10-11 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sr9Yl-1IC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <spqgV-7V7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <spqqC-7YC-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sr9vk-1fU-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <sr9vk-1fU-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <sr9vk-1fU-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Ken, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken.lin@advantech.com> wrote: > With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080@60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected. > I think the patches should fix the issue. That's good news. Thanks for testing. Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series. Emil, Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula "Ken.Lin" <ken.lin@advantech.com> - 2016-10-07 01:30 +0200
Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 01:40 +0200
RE: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula "Ken.Lin" <ken.lin@advantech.com> - 2016-10-11 20:00 +0200
Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 20:30 +0200
Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> - 2016-10-11 20:50 +0200
csiph-web