Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1497781

Re: [PATCH][v11] PM / hibernate: Verify the consistent of e820 memory map by md5 digest

From Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH][v11] PM / hibernate: Verify the consistent of e820 memory map by md5 digest
Date 2016-10-08 19:00 +0200
Message-ID <sq38C-13t-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sl94Z-1Rq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <spGlI-36r-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Joey,
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:31:08AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Chen Yu,
> 
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:17:57PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > On some platforms, there is occasional panic triggered when trying to
> > resume from hibernation, a typical panic looks like:
> > 
> > "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff880085894000
> > IP: [<ffffffff810c5dc2>] load_image_lzo+0x8c2/0xe70"
> > 
> > Investigation carried out by Lee Chun-Yi shows that this is because
> > e820 map has been changed by BIOS across hibernation, and one
> > of the page frames from suspend kernel is right located in restore
> > kernel's unmapped region, so panic comes out when accessing unmapped
> > kernel address.
> >
> 
> Sorry for finally I can not find the issue machine back now. So I add
> a patch to fool kernel as the e820 changed when S4 resume for testing.
>  
> > In order to expose this issue earlier, the md5 hash of e820 map
> > is passed from suspend kernel to restore kernel, and the restore
> > kernel will terminate the resume process once it finds the md5
> > hash are not the same.
> >
> [...snip] 
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c b/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> > index 9634557..d81b1af 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
> >  #include <linux/gfp.h>
> >  #include <linux/smp.h>
> >  #include <linux/suspend.h>
> > +#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> > +#include <linux/kdebug.h>
> 
> [...snip]
> 
> > @@ -216,5 +297,12 @@ int arch_hibernation_header_restore(void *addr)
> >  	restore_jump_address = rdr->jump_address;
> >  	jump_address_phys = rdr->jump_address_phys;
> >  	restore_cr3 = rdr->cr3;
> > -	return (rdr->magic == RESTORE_MAGIC) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (rdr->magic != RESTORE_MAGIC)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (hibernation_e820_mismatch(rdr->e820_digest))
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> > --
> 
> Because the check_image_kernel() function doesn't check the return error,
> kernel only shows "PM: Image mismatch: architecture specific data". The
> message covered two different fail reason.
>  
> I suggest that it prints out a log like the restore function in ARM64
> architecture. Something like this, please feel free to modify the
> wording:
> 
> Index: linux/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c
> @@ -298,11 +298,16 @@ int arch_hibernation_header_restore(void
>         jump_address_phys = rdr->jump_address_phys;
>         restore_cr3 = rdr->cr3;
>  
> -       if (rdr->magic != RESTORE_MAGIC)
> +
> +       if (rdr->magic != RESTORE_MAGIC) {
> +               pr_crit("Hibernate image not generated by this kernel!\n");
>                 return -EINVAL;
> +       }
>  
> -       if (hibernation_e820_mismatch(rdr->e820_digest))
> +       if (hibernation_e820_mismatch(rdr->e820_digest)) {
> +               pr_crit("The e820 saved regions changed!\n");
>                 return -ENODEV;
> +       }
>  
>         return 0;
>  }
> 
OK, will refresh it after 4.9-rc1 released due to a e820 modification
recently.

Thanks,
Yu

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH][v11] PM / hibernate: Verify the consistent of e820 memory map by md5 digest Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-09-25 06:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH][v11] PM / hibernate: Verify the consistent of e820  memory map by md5 digest joeyli <jlee@suse.com> - 2016-10-07 18:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH][v11] PM / hibernate: Verify the consistent of e820  memory map by md5 digest Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-10-08 19:00 +0200

csiph-web