Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1496818

Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufshcd: fix possible unclocked register access

From Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufshcd: fix possible unclocked register access
Date 2016-10-06 21:10 +0200
Message-ID <spmdk-53g-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <spe65-7jB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sp6rT-2cz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <spe65-7jB-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Thanks Kim for the response.

On 2016-10-06 03:28, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> Hi, Subhash.
> 
> Some UFS host controllers may need to call the vendor specific callback
> before and after controlling by clock control framework,
> regardless of whether available clocks are turned on or off.

Are you suggesting to call ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks() 2 times, one 
before the on/off by ufshcd core driver and one after the on/off? If 
yes, then we also have add 3rd argument clarifying if this is PRE_CHANGE 
or POST_CHANGE.

> 
> Is there any special reason to limit to invoke the callback
> only when the clocks are turned on or not?
> 
> Besides, the callback is acknowledged from core driver
> because 2nd argument is whether the clocks are turned on or not.
> 
> If you have any other idea, please let me know.

This is my suggestion:
1. Add 3rd argument to setup_clocks ops to let the vendor callback 
function know if this is called PRE_CHANGE or POST_CHANGE.
2. If #1 is in place, call setup_clocks 2 times, one with PRE_CHANGE 
argument before making any clock changes in core driver, 2nd with 
POST_CHANGE argument after making the clock changes to core driver.

Let me know if this would work or not.

Thanks,
Subhash

> 
> Thanks
> Regards
> 
>> Vendor specific setup_clocks callback may require the clocks managed
>> by ufshcd driver to be ON. So if the vendor specific setup_clocks 
>> callback
>> is called while the required clocks are turned off, it could result 
>> into
>> unclocked register access.
>> 
>> To prevent possible unclock register access, this change makes sure 
>> that
>> required clocks remain enabled before calling into vendor specific
>> setup_clocks callback.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Changes from v2:
>> * Don't call ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks() again for clock off
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> index 05c7456..c1a77d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -5389,6 +5389,17 @@ static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba
>> *hba, bool on,
>>  	if (!head || list_empty(head))
>>  		goto out;
>> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * vendor specific setup_clocks ops may depend on clocks managed by
>> +	 * this standard driver hence call the vendor specific setup_clocks
>> +	 * before disabling the clocks managed here.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!on) {
>> +		ret = ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks(hba, on);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	list_for_each_entry(clki, head, list) {
>>  		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clki->clk)) {
>>  			if (skip_ref_clk && !strcmp(clki->name, "ref_clk"))
>> @@ -5410,7 +5421,16 @@ static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba
>> *hba, bool on,
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> 
>> -	ret = ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks(hba, on);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * vendor specific setup_clocks ops may depend on clocks managed by
>> +	 * this standard driver hence call the vendor specific setup_clocks
>> +	 * after enabling the clocks managed here.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (on) {
>> +		ret = ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks(hba, on);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>>  out:
>>  	if (ret) {
>>  		list_for_each_entry(clki, head, list) {
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
>> Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" 
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" 
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] scsi: ufshcd: fix possible unclocked register access Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-06 04:20 +0200
  RE: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufshcd: fix possible unclocked register access Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com> - 2016-10-06 12:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufshcd: fix possible unclocked register access Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-06 21:10 +0200
      RE: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufshcd: fix possible unclocked register access Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com> - 2016-10-07 03:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufshcd: fix possible unclocked register access Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-07 03:30 +0200

csiph-web