Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1496010
| From | Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() |
| Date | 2016-10-05 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sp038-5XR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <soGQN-xH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <soYE1-4tz-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <soYE1-4tz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <soYXo-4WW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Ben, On 10/05/2016 03:17 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > Anything's possible when a local user can run code. [snip] That > said, local users tend not to DoS themselves. Agree. I thought of something that could be particularly related to the aio implementation; but I guess there's nothing so special then. > [snip] It probably makes > sense to implement per-user limits rather than the current global limit, > and maybe even convert them to an rlimit to better fit in with the > available frameworks for managing these things. I see it would be a nice improvement, but unfortunately that's not a task that I can take at the moment. For now, the most I'm able to do is to continue to try to understand whether there's something we can do that may help the small nr_events case to be more on par with the large nr_events case.. or any other beginner-level fixes to the area. :) Thanks again, -- Mauricio Faria de Oliveira IBM Linux Technology Center
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-05 01:00 +0200
Re: aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 08:40 +0200
Re: aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-05 19:30 +0200
Re: aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-05 20:00 +0200
Re: aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> - 2016-10-05 20:20 +0200
Re: aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-05 21:30 +0200
Re: aio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus() Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> - 2016-10-05 20:10 +0200
csiph-web