Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1495465
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops |
| Date | 2016-10-04 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sozmi-4b2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sokZX-2Vp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sotTA-Ep-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:00:41AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon 03-10-16 16:30:55, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > I'm seeing a repeatable oops with Linux next while running
> > update-initramfs, see below. I tried reverting commit 59aa5a3aeead
> > ("fscrypto: make filename crypto functions return 0 on success")
> > as that's the only commit changing ext4_htree_store_dirent, but
> > that did not help.
> >
> > Anybody else seeing something like this?
>
> Never seen this but I suspect it is a fallout from Al's directory locking
> changes. In particular ext4_htree_fill_tree() builds rb-tree of found
> directory entries in file->private_data (and generally modifies the
> structure stored there) but after Al's changes we don't have exclusive
> access to struct file if I'm right so if two processes end up calling
> getdents() for the same 'struct file' we are doomed.
RTFS. We sure as hell *do* have exclusive access to struct file. See
/* POSIX.1-2008/SUSv4 Section XSI 2.9.7 */
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
f->f_mode |= FMODE_ATOMIC_POS;
in do_dentry_open() as well as
if (file && (file->f_mode & FMODE_ATOMIC_POS)) {
if (file_count(file) > 1) {
v |= FDPUT_POS_UNLOCK;
mutex_lock(&file->f_pos_lock);
}
}
in __fdget_pos() and
f = fdget_pos(fd);
if (!f.file)
return -EBADF;
in getdents(2).
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-04 01:40 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-10-04 11:10 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-10-04 16:10 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-04 16:50 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-10-04 17:00 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-10-04 21:10 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-04 21:20 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-04 21:20 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-04 21:30 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-04 21:50 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-04 22:40 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-05 12:00 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-04 16:20 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-10-04 17:00 +0200
Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-10-05 07:50 +0200
csiph-web