Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1494142
| From | Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted |
| Date | 2016-09-30 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sn78J-2XU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <smLUB-5YJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <smLUB-5YJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <smY5r-5Au-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09/30/2016 06:49 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
> but I can't help thinking that if this is a!SMP system, maybe we could only
> #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> static inline bool arch_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) { return false; }
> #else
Yes, I will add that to v3. Thanks for spotting.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-09-29 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-30 07:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-30 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-10-04 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-09-30 16:40 +0200
csiph-web