Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1492610

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field

From hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field
Date 2016-09-28 15:50 +0200
Message-ID <smnpf-7q5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <smgxr-3cB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <smjvl-4WB-79@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 9/28/16 5:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:22:21 +0800
>
>> v5:
>> - order local variables from longest to shortest line
> I still see many cases where this problem still exists.  Please
> do not resubmit this patch series until you fix all of them.
>
> Patch #2:
>
> -static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +static int snmp_seq_show_ipstats(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>   {
>   	int i;
> +	u64 buff64[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX];
>   	struct net *net = seq->private;
>
> The order should be "net" then "buff64" then "i".
Sorry for my bad eyesight and quick hand :(
B.R.
Jia
>
> +static int snmp_seq_show_tcp_udp(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct net *net = seq->private;
> +	unsigned long buff[TCPUDP_MIB_MAX];
>
> The order should be "buff", "net", then "i".
>
> Patch #3:
>
> @@ -192,13 +197,19 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_item(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *pcpumib,
>   				const struct snmp_mib *itemlist)
>   {
>   	int i;
> -	unsigned long val;
> -
>   ...
> +	unsigned long buff[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
>
> The order should be "buff" then "i".
>
> @@ -206,10 +217,13 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_item64(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *mib,
>   				  const struct snmp_mib *itemlist, size_t syncpoff)
>   {
>   	int i;
> +	u64 buff64[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
>
> Likewise.
>
> I cannot be any more explicit in my request than this.
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 6/7] ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 5/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 7/7] net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warnings Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 3/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-09-28 11:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 15:50 +0200
      Local variable ordering (was Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for  snmp_fold_field) Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2016-09-28 18:00 +0200

csiph-web