Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1492610
| From | hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field |
| Date | 2016-09-28 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <smnpf-7q5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <smgxr-3cB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <smjvl-4WB-79@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 9/28/16 5:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:22:21 +0800
>
>> v5:
>> - order local variables from longest to shortest line
> I still see many cases where this problem still exists. Please
> do not resubmit this patch series until you fix all of them.
>
> Patch #2:
>
> -static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +static int snmp_seq_show_ipstats(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> {
> int i;
> + u64 buff64[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX];
> struct net *net = seq->private;
>
> The order should be "net" then "buff64" then "i".
Sorry for my bad eyesight and quick hand :(
B.R.
Jia
>
> +static int snmp_seq_show_tcp_udp(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct net *net = seq->private;
> + unsigned long buff[TCPUDP_MIB_MAX];
>
> The order should be "buff", "net", then "i".
>
> Patch #3:
>
> @@ -192,13 +197,19 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_item(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *pcpumib,
> const struct snmp_mib *itemlist)
> {
> int i;
> - unsigned long val;
> -
> ...
> + unsigned long buff[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
>
> The order should be "buff" then "i".
>
> @@ -206,10 +217,13 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_item64(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *mib,
> const struct snmp_mib *itemlist, size_t syncpoff)
> {
> int i;
> + u64 buff64[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
>
> Likewise.
>
> I cannot be any more explicit in my request than this.
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 6/7] ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 5/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 7/7] net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warnings Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 3/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-09-28 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 15:50 +0200
Local variable ordering (was Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field) Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2016-09-28 18:00 +0200
csiph-web