Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay L2

From	James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay L2
Date	2016-09-29 17:40 +0200
Message-ID	<smLBf-5S3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<skjg6-2JH-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <slV9D-6Fu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sm653-526-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <smhMR-3RU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <smzqp-6Cv-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Katalix Systems Ltd

Show all headers | View raw

On 29/09/16 03:36, R. Parameswaran wrote:
> I agree that something like 2. below would be needed in the long run (it 
> will need some effort and redesign -e.g. how do I lookup the parent tunnel 
> from the socket when receiving a PMTU update, existing pointer chain runs 
> from tunnel to socket).
>> 2) Add code to handle PMTU events that land on the UDP tunnel
>>    socket.

Another function pointer could be added to struct udp_sock, similar to
encap_rcv,  such that the pmtu event could be handled by the UDP encap
protocol implementation.

James

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay  L2 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-09-27 09:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay  L2 "R. Parameswaran" <parameswaran.r7@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 21:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay  L2 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-09-28 09:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay  L2 "R. Parameswaran" <parameswaran.r7@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 04:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay  L2 Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com> - 2016-09-29 14:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net v2] L2TP:Adjust intf MTU,factor underlay L3,overlay L2 James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com> - 2016-09-29 17:40 +0200

csiph-web