Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1492128
| From | Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | help? usage of indirect per-cpu variables |
| Date | 2016-09-27 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sm6y5-5bY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, I'm trying to wrap my head around indirect percpu variables, and I'm hoping someone can school me on how they work. For example, in mm/slub.c we have "struct kmem_cache *s". s->cpu_slab is a per-cpu variable, so we access it with something like: c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab); and then a bit later on we do object = c->freelist; So far so good. Essentially the raw_cpu_ptr() macro applies a unique per-CPU offset to s->cpu_slab to generate "c" which is a real pointer so we can dereference it to get c->freelist. What confuses me is how we can do something like this: this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(s->cpu_slab->freelist, s->cpu_slab->tid, object, tid, next_object, next_tid(tid)) If s->cpu_slab is a special pointer that needs to be accessed only via the per-CPU macros, then how is it valid to specify "s->cpu_slab->freelist"? Since s->cpuslab isn't actually a valid address, how can we dereference it? Thanks, Chris
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
help? usage of indirect per-cpu variables Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com> - 2016-09-27 21:50 +0200
csiph-web