Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1491603

Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt

From Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt
Date 2016-09-27 01:40 +0200
Message-ID <slNF7-1NX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <skA7g-5af-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:51:13 +0200 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:

> in_interrupt() returns a nonzero value when we are either in an
> interrupt or have bh disabled via local_bh_disable(). Since we are
> interested in only ignoring coverage from actual interrupts, do a
> proper check of whether we are really in an interrupt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> ---
> It would look totally better to reuse in_irq(), in_serving_softirq() and
> in_nmi() instead of checking flags manually, but that leads to slower
> generated code (three separate tests for each of the flags). Would it be
> better to add another macro to preempt.h that would check if we're actually
> in interrupt and use it?

Yes please.  Is there anywhere else where such a macro can be used?

> --- a/kernel/kcov.c
> +++ b/kernel/kcov.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ void notrace __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(void)
>  	 * We are interested in code coverage as a function of a syscall inputs,
>  	 * so we ignore code executed in interrupts.
>  	 */
> -	if (!t || in_interrupt())
> +	if (!t || (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_OFFSET
> +							| NMI_MASK)))

Or include a prominent and very apologetic comment here explaining why
it is open-coded.  But I do agree that not open-coding it is better.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2016-09-23 17:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-09-27 01:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-09-27 08:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-27 09:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-09-27 10:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-27 13:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-09-27 14:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-09-27 13:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-09-27 13:30 +0200

csiph-web