Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1491535
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom |
| Date | 2016-09-26 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <slKnT-8jM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <slFRg-5rZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 04:16:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Today, show_stack() accepts a NULL task parameter, which it takes to mean the
> current task. However, as noted in tip/x86/asm commit:
>
> 81539169f283329f ("x86/dumpstack: Remove NULL task pointer convention")
>
> ... having a NULL task parameter imply current leads to subtle bugs in stack
> walking code (so far seen on both 86 and arm64), makes callsites harder to
> read, and is unnecessary as all callers have access to current.
>
> As a step towards removing the problematic NULL-implies-current idiom entirely,
> these patches ensure that generic code explictly passes current to
> show_stack(), rather than relying on arch code to handle NULL.
This is a good step, though it would be really nice to fix this
tree-wide. Do you have any plans to do so?
Regardless, for the series:
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
--
Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-09-26 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-09-26 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-09-26 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-09-27 20:00 +0200
csiph-web