Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1491278

[PATCH -v2 3/9] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the dl_runtime/dl_period update

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH -v2 3/9] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the dl_runtime/dl_period update
Date 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
Message-ID <slDw5-3SS-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <slDw5-3SS-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Currently dl tasks will actually return at the very beginning
of rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() in !detect_deadlock cases:

    if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
        if (!detect_deadlock)
            goto out_unlock_pi; // out here
        else
            requeue = false;
    }

As the deadline value of blocked deadline tasks(waiters) without
changing their sched_class(thus prio doesn't change) never changes,
this seems reasonable, but it actually misses the chance of updating
rt_mutex_waiter's "dl_runtime(period)_copy" if a waiter updates its
deadline parameters(dl_runtime, dl_period) or boosted waiter changes
to !deadline class.

Thus, force deadline task not out by adding the !dl_prio() condition.

Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460633827-345-7-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com
---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
 	 * enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain
 	 * walk.
 	 */
-	if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
+	if (waiter->prio == task->prio && !dl_task(task)) {
 		if (!detect_deadlock)
 			goto out_unlock_pi;
 		else

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH -v2 0/9] PI and assorted failings Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
  [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-09-26 18:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-29 17:00 +0200
  [PATCH -v2 3/9] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the dl_runtime/dl_period update Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -v2 3/9] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the  dl_runtime/dl_period update Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-09-26 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -v2 3/9] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the  dl_runtime/dl_period update Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-29 17:00 +0200
  [PATCH -v2 8/9] rtmutex: Fix PI chain order integrity Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
  [PATCH -v2 6/9] sched/rtmutex: Refactor rt_mutex_setprio() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -v2 6/9] sched/rtmutex: Refactor rt_mutex_setprio() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-09-26 19:00 +0200
  [PATCH -v2 7/9] sched,tracing: Update trace_sched_pi_setprio() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -v2 7/9] sched,tracing: Update trace_sched_pi_setprio() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-09-26 19:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH -v2 7/9] sched,tracing: Update trace_sched_pi_setprio() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-27 09:50 +0200
  [PATCH -v2 4/9] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_fastunlock() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH -v2 4/9] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_fastunlock() Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-29 17:00 +0200
  [PATCH -v2 9/9] rtmutex: Fix more prio comparisons Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-26 14:50 +0200

csiph-web