Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1491187

[PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a lockdep subclass

From Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a lockdep subclass
Date 2016-09-26 12:00 +0200
Message-ID <slARz-2d9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Since there's an rc8 I thought I'd send a follow-up patch to the
series addressing the lockdep false positive in pca953x.

The reason for setting the subclass in the probe function is not
explained in the code nor is it obvious at first glance. This patch
adds a comment explaining the problem.

Rebased on top of current i2c/for-next.

Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
  gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a lockdep
    subclass

 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

-- 
2.7.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a lockdep subclass Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-26 12:00 +0200
  [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a lockdep subclass Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-26 12:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a  lockdep subclass Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-09-26 12:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a  lockdep subclass Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-09-29 08:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a  lockdep subclass Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-29 10:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a  lockdep subclass Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-09-29 10:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a  lockdep subclass Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-10-04 14:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a  lockdep subclass Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-10-12 09:10 +0200

csiph-web