Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1489948
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations |
| Date | 2016-09-23 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skwwF-2RT-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <skg8x-Rq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <skvhg-1XI-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <skvTY-2pQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <skw3D-2sP-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> It's just the names like "out" or "restart" perfectly explain why the labels exists. I have got an other impression. > So they fulfill this requirement from the coding style as far as I can see. Short identifiers might look more convenient in some cases because they are quicker to type. > So why do you want to change them? 1. I suggest to select identifiers also for jump labels which are more meaningful and eventually unique for some function implementations. 2. How do you think about to add a single space character before any label? Regards, Markus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 00/14] GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/14] GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> - 2016-09-23 11:50 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 12:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> - 2016-09-23 12:40 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 13:10 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> - 2016-09-23 13:20 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 13:50 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> - 2016-09-23 15:10 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-09-23 15:00 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 15:50 +0200
csiph-web