Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1489095

Re: [PATCH 3/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection

From Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection
Date 2016-09-22 19:10 +0200
Message-ID <skfFv-Hc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sk7HX-3Yu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sk7HY-3Yu-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/22/16 11:33, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:06:50 +0200
> 
> The of_node_put() function was called in some cases
> by the tilcdc_convert_slave_node() function during error handling
> even if the passed variable contained a null pointer.
> 
> * Adjust jump targets according to the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> * Split a condition check for resource detection failures so that
>   each pointer from these function calls will be checked immediately.
> 
>   See also background information:
>   Topic "CWE-754: Improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions"
>   Link: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/754.html
> 

I don't really agree with this patch. There is no harm in calling
of_node_put() with NULL as an argument and because of that there is no
point in making the function more complex and harder to maintain.

Best regards,
Jyri

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> index 6204405..6ee5865 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> @@ -209,25 +209,27 @@ void __init tilcdc_convert_slave_node(void)
>  		return;
>  
>  	lcdc = of_find_matching_node(NULL, tilcdc_of_match);
> -	slave = of_find_matching_node(NULL, tilcdc_slave_of_match);
> +	if (!of_device_is_available(lcdc))
> +		goto free_table;
>  
> -	if (!slave || !of_device_is_available(lcdc))
> -		goto out;
> +	slave = of_find_matching_node(NULL, tilcdc_slave_of_match);
> +	if (!slave)
> +		goto put_node_lcdc;
>  
>  	i2c = of_parse_phandle(slave, "i2c", 0);
>  	if (!i2c) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Can't find i2c node trough phandle\n", __func__);
> -		goto out;
> +		goto put_node_slave;
>  	}
>  
>  	overlay = tilcdc_get_overlay(&kft);
>  	if (!overlay)
> -		goto out;
> +		goto put_node_i2c;
>  
>  	encoder = of_find_matching_node(overlay, tilcdc_tda998x_of_match);
>  	if (!encoder) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Failed to find tda998x node\n", __func__);
> -		goto out;
> +		goto put_node_i2c;
>  	}
>  
>  	tilcdc_copy_props(slave, encoder, tilcdc_slave_props, &kft);
> @@ -238,10 +240,10 @@ void __init tilcdc_convert_slave_node(void)
>  			continue;
>  		if (!strncmp("i2c", (char *)prop->value, prop->length))
>  			if (tilcdc_prop_str_update(prop, i2c->full_name, &kft))
> -				goto out;
> +				goto put_node_fragment;
>  		if (!strncmp("lcdc", (char *)prop->value, prop->length))
>  			if (tilcdc_prop_str_update(prop, lcdc->full_name, &kft))
> -				goto out;
> +				goto put_node_fragment;
>  	}
>  
>  	tilcdc_node_disable(slave);
> @@ -252,12 +254,16 @@ void __init tilcdc_convert_slave_node(void)
>  	else
>  		pr_info("%s: ti,tilcdc,slave node successfully converted\n",
>  			__func__);
> -out:
> -	kfree_table_free(&kft);
> + put_node_fragment:
> +	of_node_put(fragment);
> + put_node_i2c:
>  	of_node_put(i2c);
> + put_node_slave:
>  	of_node_put(slave);
> + put_node_lcdc:
>  	of_node_put(lcdc);
> -	of_node_put(fragment);
> + free_table:
> +	kfree_table_free(&kft);
>  }
>  
>  int __init tilcdc_slave_compat_init(void)
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Fine-tuning for two function  implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 10:40 +0200
  [PATCH 2/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Return directly after a failed  kfree_table_init() in tilcdc_convert_slave_node() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 10:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Return directly after a failed  kfree_table_init() in tilcdc_convert_slave_node() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-09-22 13:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Return directly after a failed  kfree_table_init() in tilcdc_convert_slave_node() Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com> - 2016-09-22 19:00 +0200
      Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Return directly after a failed kfree_table_init()  in tilcdc_convert_slave_node() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 20:20 +0200
  [PATCH 3/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 10:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com> - 2016-09-22 19:10 +0200
      Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 20:40 +0200
        Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com> - 2016-09-22 22:30 +0200
          Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 09:40 +0200
            Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com> - 2016-09-23 12:40 +0200
              Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 13:00 +0200
        Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in tilcdc_convert_slave_node()  after error detection Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 13:00 +0200
          Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 13:30 +0200
            Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in tilcdc_convert_slave_node()  after error detection Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 13:40 +0200
              Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in  tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 14:20 +0200
  [PATCH 4/4] GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Delete unnecessary variable  initialisations in tilcdc_convert_slave_node() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 10:40 +0200

csiph-web