Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1488942
| From | Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support |
| Date | 2016-09-22 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skdkl-7zs-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <sf2zg-3eC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfr4B-1xy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <shzKq-4a4-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <shC5z-5KS-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <shFmO-7Jn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Pramod, On 9/15/2016 7:28 PM, Pramod Gurav wrote: > On 15 September 2016 at 15:49, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 15 September 2016 at 09:59, Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 9 September 2016 at 15:48, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> On 09/08/2016 11:02 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 01/09/16 17:23, Pramod Gurav wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Provides runtime PM callbacks to enable and disable clock resources >>>>>> when idle. Also support system PM callbacks to be called during system >>>>>> suspend and resume. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@linaro.org> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can we get some Tested/Reviewed/Acked-by from people using this driver? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Pramod, >>>> Thanks for the patch. Unfortunately, my db410c board fails to >>>> boot when i apply it. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks Georgi for testing the patch. Its my wrong I did not update my >>> kernel and continued fixing comments on old kernel. >>> After spending some time I came to know that below change is causing the issue: >>> >>> Author: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> >>> Date: Tue Jul 12 15:46:17 2016 +0800 >>> >>> mmc: sdhci: add standard hw auto retuning support >>> >>> If HW supports SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3 which is auto retuning, we won't >>> retune during runtime suspend and resume, instead we use Re-tuning >>> Request signaled via SDHCI_INT_RETUNE interrupt to do retuning and >>> hw auto retuning during data transfer to guarantee the signal sample >>> window correction. >>> >>> This can avoid a mass of repeatedly retuning during small file system >>> data access and improve the performance. >>> >>> Specially these lines that was added to suspend path: >>> >>> + if (host->tuning_mode != SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3) >>> + mmc_retune_needed(host->mmc); >>> >>> During sdhci setup in msm driver, the host returns the values to set >>> sdhci auto tuning as supported. >>> Hence host->tuning_mode is set to SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3 during setup. >>> But some how the auto tuning is not happening. >>> Just to verify my case, I removed the 'if' part in above code and got >>> the FS mounted. >>> >>> Is there anything else needed in msm sdhci driver so that the auto >>> tuning is taken care of? >> >> I am not familiar with any other than sdhci-esdhc-imx which supports >> the SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3. I may be wrong though. >> >> In the sdhci-esdhc-imx case, enabling of auto tuning seems to be done >> in esdhc_post_tuning(), where a vendor specific register >> (ESDHC_MIX_CTRL) is being written to. Perhaps something similar in >> your case? >> > Thanks Ulf for the comments. Will check this and see if there is > something of this sort we have to do to achieve auto tuning. > Adding Ritesh who has been posting some SDHCI MSM patches recently in > case he knows about this. Internally, we don't use this Auto re-tuning and rely on explicit re-tune by host driver. Question though - 1. why do we need to call sdhci_runtime_resume/suspend from sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend/resume? From what I see is, sdhci_runtime_susend/resume will do reset and re-program of host->pwr and host->clk because of which a retune will be required for the next command after runtime resume. We can *only* disable and enable the clocks in sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend/resume? Thoughts? With this, I suppose you would not see any issue. Though for this issue, since internally also auto retuning is never used, we can have this mode disabled. I can once again check with HW team to get more details about this mode for MSM controller. > > Regards, > Pramod >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@linaro.org> - 2016-09-15 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2016-09-15 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@linaro.org> - 2016-09-15 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org> - 2016-09-22 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@linaro.org> - 2016-09-23 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2016-09-23 12:10 +0200
csiph-web