Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1490608
| From | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h |
| Date | 2016-09-24 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skRhM-7Cx-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <skN4t-4T8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sk47n-1KL-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <skN4t-4T8-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 01:45:33PM +0900, Seung-Woo Kim wrote: > With the patch "arm: ubsan: select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL", I got > following UBSAN warning on Exynos5422 SoC board. Well, the simple solution is to have fls() and ffs() take unsigned int arguments rather than ints - but the question that brings up is: why do both of these take signed ints? It seems at least to me that it would be more sensible for these to take unsigned int, or even unsigned long like the other bitops do. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com> - 2016-09-24 06:50 +0200 Re: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-09-24 11:20 +0200
csiph-web