Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1490503
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] thread_info: use unsigned long for flags |
| Date | 2016-09-24 01:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skIo9-1T3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <skCsp-6Lq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <skD58-7dw-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Adding Ingo, so this doesn't get lost -- please see the end of the mail]
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:08:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > The generic THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK definition of thread_info::flags is a
> > u32, matching x86 prior to the introduction of THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK.
> >
> > However, common helpers like test_ti_thread_flag() implicitly assume
> > that thread_info::flags has at least the size and alignment of unsigned
> > long, and relying on padding and alignment provided by other elements of
> > task_struct is somewhat fragile. Additionally, some architectures use
> > more that 32 bits for thread_info::flags, and others may need to in
> > future.
> >
> > With THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK, task struct follows thread_info with a long
> > field, and thus we no longer save any space as we did back in commit
> > affa219b60a11b32 ("x86: change thread_info's flag field back to 32
> > bits").
> >
> > Given all this, it makes more sense for the generic thread_info::flags
> > to be an unsigned long. Make it so.
>
> I have only one problem with this, and it's a general objection that's
> mostly off topic: why the [expletive] do the arch-independent bitfield
> helpers think in units of variable size? It's *absurd*, especially on
> big-endian architectures.
>
> Now that that's out of my system, I think this patch is fine.
> Big-endian arches that opt in will have to deal with it somehow, but I
> don't see why making it 'unsigned long' is worse than anything else.
> x86 is fine with this change.
FWIW, given <linux/thread_info.h> contains/uses the helpers mentioned above, BE
arches *must* use unsigned long (or something of the same size) today, or they
wouldn't work. In v4.8-rc7 that is the case:
$ ls -l arch | wc -l
33
# Note the above includes Kconfig, so there are 32 to consider
$ git grep -W 'struct thread_info {' -- arch/*/include | \
grep flags | grep 'unsigned long\s\+flags' | wc -l
29
$ git grep -W 'struct thread_info {' -- arch/*/include | \
grep flags | grep 'int\s\+flags'
arch/alpha/include/asm/thread_info.h- unsigned int flags; /* low level flags */
$ git grep -W 'struct thread_info {' -- arch/*/include | \
grep flags | grep 'u32\s\+flags'
arch/ia64/include/asm/thread_info.h- __u32 flags; /* thread_info flags (see TIF_*) */
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h- __u32 flags; /* low level flags */
> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>
> Ingo, can you apply this for 4.9 so that we can make this change
> before other arches might start depending on the field being u32?
>
> --Andy
Thanks,
Mark.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] thread_info: use unsigned long for flags Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-09-23 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] thread_info: use unsigned long for flags Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-09-23 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] thread_info: use unsigned long for flags Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-09-24 01:50 +0200
[tip:x86/asm] thread_info: Use unsigned long for flags tip-bot for Mark Rutland <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-09-24 18:40 +0200
csiph-web