Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1490379

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

From Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21
Date 2016-09-23 20:30 +0200
Message-ID <skDou-7lF-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sjITg-5i1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Changes since 20160920:
> [...]
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11180
>  8424 files changed, 456474 insertions(+), 237951 deletions(-)

What happened here? The previous linux-next tree was much smaller. The
"changes since" part doesn't actually talk about the almost 3000 new
non-merge commits that very suddenly showed up.

I wonder if your automation could add some notes on things like this
when clearly one of the trees changes radically. Back in 20160920,
linux-next looked fairly small compared to previous releases. And then
the next day it suddenly looked quite big.

I get the feeling that several thousand new commits just before the
merge window opens is not a good sign. Of course, I'm planning an rc8
this time around anyway, but even so this is pretty surprising.

           Linus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-21 08:10 +0200
  Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-09-23 20:30 +0200
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-24 02:50 +0200
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-09-24 09:30 +0200

csiph-web