Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1490379
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 |
| Date | 2016-09-23 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skDou-7lF-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sjITg-5i1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Changes since 20160920:
> [...]
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11180
> 8424 files changed, 456474 insertions(+), 237951 deletions(-)
What happened here? The previous linux-next tree was much smaller. The
"changes since" part doesn't actually talk about the almost 3000 new
non-merge commits that very suddenly showed up.
I wonder if your automation could add some notes on things like this
when clearly one of the trees changes radically. Back in 20160920,
linux-next looked fairly small compared to previous releases. And then
the next day it suddenly looked quite big.
I get the feeling that several thousand new commits just before the
merge window opens is not a good sign. Of course, I'm planning an rc8
this time around anyway, but even so this is pretty surprising.
Linus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-21 08:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-09-23 20:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-24 02:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-09-24 09:30 +0200
csiph-web