Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1490251
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v3] docs-rst: user: add MAINTAINERS |
| Date | 2016-09-23 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skAqC-5wp-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <skAgW-5sZ-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | LWN.net |
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:07:33 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> wrote: > including MAINTAINERS using ReST is tricky, because all > maintainer's entries are like: So I'm generally in favor of moving things over to RST, but I have to ask: what's the payoff for doing that with the MAINTAINERS file? I *suppose* it's documentation, but it's also really a flat-file database of who-to-email information. I'm not sure I see the value of including it in the docs? What am I missing here? Thanks, jon
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH v3] docs-rst: user: add MAINTAINERS Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2016-09-23 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] docs-rst: user: add MAINTAINERS Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-09-23 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] docs-rst: user: add MAINTAINERS Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2016-09-23 17:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] docs-rst: user: add MAINTAINERS Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2016-09-23 18:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] docs-rst: user: add MAINTAINERS Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-09-23 18:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v3] docs-rst: user: add MAINTAINERS Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2016-09-23 20:00 +0200
csiph-web