Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1487080
| From | Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate |
| Date | 2016-09-20 08:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjmzn-7Jp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sjcgF-10E-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjcqm-149-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjd33-1xh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjfoe-34D-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjl0C-6HJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes: > On 09/19/2016 03:36 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:08:16PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:12:14PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>>> The OS timer rate used for the watchdog can now be fetched from the >>>> standard clock API. This will remove the last user of >>>> get_clock_tick_rate() in both pxa and sa11x0 architectures. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> >>> >>> Did you test this ? Potential problem, if built into the kernel, could be that >>> the clocks might not be ready by the time the driver is instantiated. Unless >>> this is converted to a platform driver, it won't be able to handle a >>> -EPROBE_DEFER from the clock subsystem. >> >> Really not a problem at all. The OSTIMER0 is required for the system >> tick, and if that's not present, the kernel will be without any kind >> of time keeping, so a missing watchdog driver is the least of the >> problems. >> >> Therefore, both PXA and SA11x0 register their clocks really early to >> ensure that OSTIMER0 is available by the time_init() stage, which is >> way before driver probe time. >> > > You are right. And, at least in qemu, it actually works. Hi Guenter, Yes, it was tested on pxa25x (lubbock) and pxa27x (mainstone). Cheers. -- Robert
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/4] kill get_clock_tick_rate() Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-09-19 21:20 +0200
[PATCH 2/4] ARM: sa11x0/pxa: acquire timer rate from the clock rate Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-09-19 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: sa11x0/pxa: acquire timer rate from the clock rate Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-09-19 21:50 +0200
[PATCH 1/4] clk: pxa25x: OSTIMER0 clocks from the main oscillator Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-09-19 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: pxa25x: OSTIMER0 clocks from the main oscillator Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-09-19 21:30 +0200
[PATCH 3/4] watchdog: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-09-19 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-09-19 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-09-20 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-09-20 06:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-09-20 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-09-20 06:40 +0200
[PATCH 4/4] ARM: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2016-09-19 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: sa11x0/pxa: get rid of get_clock_tick_rate Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-09-19 22:00 +0200
csiph-web