Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1488371
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: Correctly bounds check virt_addr_valid |
| Date | 2016-09-21 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjW0a-545-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sjTvj-3ps-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjTYm-3z1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjVx7-4Eu-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:34:46PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 09/21/2016 10:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >Are there other potentially-broken users of virt_addr_valid? It's not > >clear to me what some drivers are doing with this, and therefore whether > >we need to cc stable. > > The number of users is pretty limited. Some of them use it as a debugging > check, others are using it more like hardened usercopy. The number of > users that would actually affect arm64 seems so small I don't think it's > worth trying to backport to stable. Ok. > Hardened usercopy was getting hit particularly hard because usercopy was > happening on all types of memory whereas the drivers tend to be more limited > in scope. Sure. > >Given the common sub-expression, perhaps it would be better to leave > >these as-is, but prefix them with '_', and after the #endif, have > >something like: > > > >#define _virt_addr_is_linear(kaddr) (((u64)(kaddr)) >= PAGE_OFFSET) > >#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (_virt_addr_is_linear(kaddr) && _virt_addr_valid(kaddr)) > > > > Good suggestion. FWIW, with that, feel free to add: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Thanks, Mark.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] arm64: Correctly bounds check virt_addr_valid Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-09-21 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: Correctly bounds check virt_addr_valid Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-09-21 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: Correctly bounds check virt_addr_valid Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-09-21 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: Correctly bounds check virt_addr_valid Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-09-21 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: Correctly bounds check virt_addr_valid Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-09-21 22:10 +0200
csiph-web