Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1488288

Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions

From Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions
Date 2016-09-21 19:20 +0200
Message-ID <sjTlD-3mu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sep4R-2HY-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue 06-09-16 15:52:54, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> After several people reported OOM's for order-2 allocations in 4.7 due to
> Michal Hocko's OOM rework, he reverted the part that considered compaction
> feedback [1] in the decisions to retry reclaim/compaction. This was to provide
> a fix quickly for 4.8 rc and 4.7 stable series, while mmotm had an almost
> complete solution that instead improved compaction reliability.
> 
> This series completes the mmotm solution and reintroduces the compaction
> feedback into OOM decisions. The first two patches restore the state of mmotm
> before the temporary solution was merged, the last patch should be the missing
> piece for reliability. The third patch restricts the hardened compaction to
> non-costly orders, since costly orders don't result in OOMs in the first place.
> 
> Some preliminary testing suggested that this approach should work, but I would
> like to ask all who experienced the regression to please retest this. You will
> need to apply this series on top of tag mmotm-2016-08-31-16-06 from the mmotm
> git tree [2]. Thanks in advance!

We still do not ignore fragindex in the full priority. This part has
always been quite unclear to me so I cannot really tell whether that
makes any difference or not but just to be on the safe side I would
preffer to have _all_ the shortcuts out of the way in the highest
priority. It is true that this will cause COMPACT_NOT_SUITABLE_ZONE
so keep retrying but still a complication to understand the workflow.

What do you think?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-21 19:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-09-22 17:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-23 10:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-09-23 13:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-23 14:20 +0200

csiph-web