Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1488288
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions |
| Date | 2016-09-21 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjTlD-3mu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sep4R-2HY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 06-09-16 15:52:54, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > After several people reported OOM's for order-2 allocations in 4.7 due to > Michal Hocko's OOM rework, he reverted the part that considered compaction > feedback [1] in the decisions to retry reclaim/compaction. This was to provide > a fix quickly for 4.8 rc and 4.7 stable series, while mmotm had an almost > complete solution that instead improved compaction reliability. > > This series completes the mmotm solution and reintroduces the compaction > feedback into OOM decisions. The first two patches restore the state of mmotm > before the temporary solution was merged, the last patch should be the missing > piece for reliability. The third patch restricts the hardened compaction to > non-costly orders, since costly orders don't result in OOMs in the first place. > > Some preliminary testing suggested that this approach should work, but I would > like to ask all who experienced the regression to please retest this. You will > need to apply this series on top of tag mmotm-2016-08-31-16-06 from the mmotm > git tree [2]. Thanks in advance! We still do not ignore fragindex in the full priority. This part has always been quite unclear to me so I cannot really tell whether that makes any difference or not but just to be on the safe side I would preffer to have _all_ the shortcuts out of the way in the highest priority. It is true that this will cause COMPACT_NOT_SUITABLE_ZONE so keep retrying but still a complication to understand the workflow. What do you think? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-21 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-09-22 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-23 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-09-23 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-09-23 14:20 +0200
csiph-web