Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1488123
| From | Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: notifiers registration cleanup |
| Date | 2016-09-21 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjPL4-146-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sjOYF-yH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 15:33 +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> By design notifier can be registered once only,
> however nfsd registers the same inetaddr notifiers per net-namespace.
> When this happen it corrupts list of notifiers,
> as result some notifiers can be not called on proper event,
> traverse on list can be cycled forever,
> and second unregister can access already freed memory.
>
> fixes: 36684996 ("nfsd: Register callbacks on the inetaddr_chain and inet6addr_chain")
> > Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> index 45007ac..7f8914f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> @@ -366,14 +366,20 @@ static struct notifier_block nfsd_inet6addr_notifier = {
> };
> #endif
>
> +static atomic_t nfsd_notifier_refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +
> static void nfsd_last_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
> {
> > struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
>
> > - unregister_inetaddr_notifier(&nfsd_inetaddr_notifier);
> > + /* check if the notifier still has clients */
> > + if (atomic_dec_return(&nfsd_notifier_refcount) == 0) {
> > + unregister_inetaddr_notifier(&nfsd_inetaddr_notifier);
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> > - unregister_inet6addr_notifier(&nfsd_inet6addr_notifier);
> > + unregister_inet6addr_notifier(&nfsd_inet6addr_notifier);
> #endif
> > + }
> +
> > /*
> > * write_ports can create the server without actually starting
> > * any threads--if we get shut down before any threads are
> @@ -488,10 +494,13 @@ int nfsd_create_serv(struct net *net)
> > }
>
> > set_max_drc();
> > - register_inetaddr_notifier(&nfsd_inetaddr_notifier);
> > + /* check if the notifier is already set */
> > + if (atomic_inc_return(&nfsd_notifier_refcount) == 1) {
> > + register_inetaddr_notifier(&nfsd_inetaddr_notifier);
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> > - register_inet6addr_notifier(&nfsd_inet6addr_notifier);
> > + register_inet6addr_notifier(&nfsd_inet6addr_notifier);
> #endif
> > + }
> > > do_gettimeofday(&nn->nfssvc_boot); /* record boot time */
> > return 0;
> }
Good catch. I'm not very fond of the refcounting this here but it
should
serve the purpose and I don't have anything better to suggest. FWIW, I
think the nfsd_mutex is held during all of these operations so we
probably don't need atomics for the refcount.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] NFSD: notifiers registration cleanup Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-09-21 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: notifiers registration cleanup Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> - 2016-09-21 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: notifiers registration cleanup Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-09-22 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: notifiers registration cleanup "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> - 2016-09-22 18:20 +0200
csiph-web