Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1487920
| From | Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] debugfs: remove unused variable |
| Date | 2016-09-21 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjLxM-6M9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sjvW1-5lT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjKLo-6u9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:17:15PM +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> >> --- >> fs/debugfs/file.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/file.c b/fs/debugfs/file.c >> index 592059f..04eca0b 100644 >> --- a/fs/debugfs/file.c >> +++ b/fs/debugfs/file.c >> @@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ static int full_proxy_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) >> const struct dentry *dentry = F_DENTRY(filp); >> const struct file_operations *real_fops = REAL_FOPS_DEREF(dentry); >> const struct file_operations *proxy_fops = filp->f_op; >> - int r = 0; >> >> /* >> * We must not protect this against removal races here: the >> @@ -204,7 +203,7 @@ static int full_proxy_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) >> * ->i_private is still being meaningful here. >> */ >> if (real_fops->release) >> - r = real_fops->release(inode, filp); >> + real_fops->release(inode, filp); > > Hm, shouldn't we be propagating the result back up the call chain? AFAICS, the VFS layer doesn't ever evaluate the return value of ->release(), c.f. __fput() in fs/file_table.c . OTOH, propagating that value back to caller also wouldn't hurt. But this would be a matter of taste/coding style. I can't remember whether I left this unused int r there on purpose. I doubt not. Eric, did you run your patch through sparse and Coccinelle? If so, Reviewed-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> for the diff. (This patch lacks a description though.) Thanks, Nicolai
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] debugfs: remove unused variable Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> - 2016-09-20 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: remove unused variable Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-09-21 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: remove unused variable Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> - 2016-09-21 10:40 +0200
[PATCH] debugfs: propagate release() call result Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> - 2016-09-21 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: propagate release() call result Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-09-21 11:20 +0200
[PATCH v2] debugfs: propagate release() call result Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> - 2016-09-21 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: remove unused variable Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] debugfs: remove unused variable Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> - 2016-09-21 11:30 +0200
csiph-web