Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1487748

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

From Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
Date 2016-09-21 03:20 +0200
Message-ID <sjEmB-2hJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sjn2p-7SH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjCut-16r-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjDAe-1MD-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Am Mittwoch, 21 September 2016, 10:27:46 schrieb Michael Ellerman:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:00:32 +1000 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> 
wrote:
> >> Ah yep looks like that's the problem, patch below should fix it?
> > 
> > Yeah, I am just going to (logically) run "sed
> > 's/CONFIG_WORD_SIZE/BITS/'"
> > over the tree during the merge of the apm-current tree today.
> > 
> >> I think I'd actually prefer it if purgatory didn't redefine the CFLAGS
> >> from scratch, so I'll see if Thiago can do that and send a new version.
> > 
> > That could be better, but there are still some additions of
> > CONFIG_WORD_SIZE elsewhere :-(
> 
> I don't see any others in yesterday's next?

This kbuild failure is one case:

https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-September/148898.html

elf_util_64.o is only built if CONFIG_WORD_SIZE=64. This is affects the 
bisectabilty of many patches in the kexec_file_load series. Should I post a 
new version rebased on powerpc/next?

-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-20 08:50 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-20 09:40 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-21 01:20 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-09-21 02:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-21 03:20 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-21 04:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-09-21 08:10 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-21 04:30 +0200

csiph-web