Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1485609
| From | Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/e820: Use much less memory for e820/e820_saved, save up to 120k |
| Date | 2016-09-17 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <siv21-7BF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sfoT8-4V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <shyY1-3SK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09/15/2016 09:04 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> The maximum size of e820 map array for EFI systems is defined as
>> E820_X_MAX (E820MAX + 3 * MAX_NUMNODES).
>>
>> In x86_64 defconfig, this ends up with E820_X_MAX = 320, e820 and e820_saved
>> are 6404 bytes each.
>>
>> With larger configs, for example Fedora kernels, E820_X_MAX = 3200, e820 and e820_saved
>> are 64004 bytes each. Most of this space is wasted. Typical machines have some 20-30
>> e820 areas at most.
>>
>> This patch turns e820 and e820_saved to pointers which initially point to __initdata
>> tables, of the same size as before.
>>
>> At the very end of setup_arch(), when we are done fiddling with these maps,
>> allocate smaller alloc_bootmem blocks, copy maps there, and change pointers.
>>
>> Run-tested.
>
>> +/*
>> + * Initial e820 and e820_saved are largish __initdata arrays.
>> + * Copy them to (usually much smaller) dynamically allocated area.
>> + * This is done after all tweaks we ever do to them.
>> + */
>> +__init void e820_reallocate_tables(void)
>> +{
>> + struct e820map *n;
>> + int size;
>> +
>> + size = offsetof(struct e820map, map) + sizeof(struct e820entry) * e820->nr_map;
>> + n = alloc_bootmem(size);
>> + memcpy(n, e820, size);
>> + e820 = n;
>> +
>> + size = offsetof(struct e820map, map) + sizeof(struct e820entry) * e820_saved->nr_map;
>> + n = alloc_bootmem(size);
>> + memcpy(n, e820_saved, size);
>> + e820_saved = n;
>> +}
>
> Ok, this makes me quite nervous, could you please split this into two patches so
> that any fails can be nicely bisected to?
No problem.
> First patch only does the pointerization changes with a trivial placeholder
> structure (full size, static allocated), second patch does all the dangerous bits
> such as changing it to __initdata, allocating and copying over bits.
>
> Also, could we please also add some minimal debugging facility to make sure the
> memory table does not get extended after it's been reallocated?
I have another idea: run e820_reallocate_tables() later, just before
we free __init and __initdata. Then e820 tables _can't_ be_ changed -
all functions which do that are __init functions.
Will test this now, and send a patchset.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/e820: Use much less memory for e820/e820_saved, save up to 120k Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-09-15 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/e820: Use much less memory for e820/e820_saved, save up to 120k Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> - 2016-09-17 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/e820: Use much less memory for e820/e820_saved, save up to 120k Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-09-18 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/e820: Use much less memory for e820/e820_saved, save up to 120k Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> - 2016-09-18 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/e820: Use much less memory for e820/e820_saved, save up to 120k Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-09-18 22:00 +0200
csiph-web