Re: Possible code defects: macros and precedence

From	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Possible code defects: macros and precedence
Date	2016-09-18 11:30 +0200
Message-ID	<siGA9-6ms-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <sdCGS-5AL-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sdHdv-7o0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sivln-7I9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sivOv-7RU-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <siCmR-3xx-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 06:57 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> You did say that checkpatch was giving a lot of noise.  In the end, is it
> actually just that there are a lot of changes to make

Actually, the first attempt used just the checkpatch $Operators
pattern match which also matches a comma so there were a lot
of false positives.

This current version specifically excludes commas so there
seem to be far fewer or nearly no false positives.

There are a _lot_ of matches though.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Possible code defects: macros and precedence Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-09-18 00:00 +0200
  Re: Possible code defects: macros and precedence Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-09-18 07:00 +0200
    Re: Possible code defects: macros and precedence Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-09-18 11:30 +0200

csiph-web