Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1485353
| From | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] Documentation/applying-patches.txt: convert it to ReST markup |
| Date | 2016-09-16 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <si7VL-1eB-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <shgop-ao-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <shgoq-ao-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <si4XU-7Hc-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Samsung |
Em Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:10:26 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> escreveu: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:34 -0300 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> wrote: > > > - use the correct markup to identify each section; > > > > - Add some blank lines for Sphinx to properly interpret > > the markups; > > > > - Remove a blank space on some paragraphs; > > > > - Fix the verbatim and bold markups; > > > > - Cleanup the remaining errors to make Sphinx happy. > > So I certainly don't have a problem with the changes made to this file, but > there is some discomfort at a higher level: > > > +Last update: > > + 2006-01-05 > > I have to wonder what the value of a document saying how to FTP the patch > and move up to 2.6.13 is in 2016. As you're commenting my first patch series, I suspect you didn't see the second one yet ;) Its subject is: [PATCH 00/17] Improve documentation for the development-process There, I read all files that were moved to the development-process dir, and updated some things. I didn't read yet the files that were already there, but, as they're newer, I suspect they should be more synchronized with the status quo. In the case of this file, I updated it to point to 4.x, removed some legacy stuff, like the -git tarballs and updated the parts that mention the -mm kernels, adding a notice about linux-next. The patch is at: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9332673/ > > Who knows, there might still be value in a discussion of using the patch > tool. Well, it teaches how to use the "patch" tool, with can be useful for newbies. It also explains how the incremental and non-incremental Kernel patches work. So, I guess it is still useful. > But I think we should seriously consider making a "historical" > section for documents that are nearing or past their expiration dates. > > jon Thanks, Mauro
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 05/21] Documentation/applying-patches.txt: convert it to ReST markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2016-09-14 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] Documentation/applying-patches.txt: convert it to ReST markup Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-09-16 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] Documentation/applying-patches.txt: convert it to ReST markup Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-09-16 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] Documentation/applying-patches.txt: convert it to ReST markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2016-09-16 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] Documentation/applying-patches.txt: convert it to ReST markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2016-09-16 22:30 +0200
csiph-web