Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1485010
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, vmscan: Batch removal of mappings under a single lock during reclaim |
| Date | 2016-09-16 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <si202-5IX-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sfqLf-1c3-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfqUV-1ud-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <si1nj-5f0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:25:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > Pages unmapped during reclaim acquire/release the mapping->tree_lock for > > every single page. There are two cases when it's likely that pages at the > > tail of the LRU share the same mapping -- large amounts of IO to/from a > > single file and swapping. This patch acquires the mapping->tree_lock for > > multiple page removals. > > So, once upon a time, in a galaxy far away,.. I did a concurrent > pagecache patch set that replaced the tree_lock with a per page bit- > spinlock and fine grained locking in the radix tree. > > I know the mm has changed quite a bit since, but would such an approach > still be feasible? > > I cannot seem to find an online reference to a 'complete' version of > that patch set, but I did find the OLS paper on it and I did find some > copies on my local machines. https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2007/ols2007v2-pages-311-318.pdf
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, vmscan: Batch removal of mappings under a single lock during reclaim Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-16 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, vmscan: Batch removal of mappings under a single lock during reclaim Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-16 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, vmscan: Batch removal of mappings under a single lock during reclaim Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-09-16 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, vmscan: Batch removal of mappings under a single lock during reclaim Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-17 03:40 +0200
csiph-web