Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1483866
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not |
| Date | 2016-09-15 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shylj-3ql-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rMGf7-5Rv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMQHw-47X-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <shxSi-2ZY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 15/09/2016 07:54, Raslan, KarimAllah wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 22/06/2016 04:34, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote: >>> pfn_valid check is not sufficient because it only checks if a page has a struct >>> page or not, if for example "mem=" was passed to the kernel some valid pages >>> won't have a struct page. This means that if guests were assigned valid memory >>> that lies after the mem= boundary it will be passed uncached to the guest no >>> matter what the guest caching attributes are for this memory. >> >> How can you pass memory after the mem= boundary to the guest? > > Does my previous reply answer your question? Yes, but I'm not sure it's the right way to do it. Looking at the e820 memory map seems pretty hacky. Paolo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de> - 2016-09-15 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-09-15 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> - 2016-09-15 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-09-15 18:30 +0200
csiph-web