Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1483808
| From | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv |
| Date | 2016-09-15 03:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shtvj-dX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <shdgS-6sF-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <sheZk-7DT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <shhaO-GA-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2016-09-14 20:03 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>: > 2016-09-14 11:40+0200, Paolo Bonzini: >> On 14/09/2016 09:58, Wanpeng Li wrote: >>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> >>> >>> I observed that kvmvapic(to optimize flexpriority=N or AMD) is used >>> to boost TPR access when testing kvm-unit-test/eventinj.flat tpr case >>> on my haswell desktop (w/ flexpriority, w/o APICv). Commit (8d14695f9542 >>> x86, apicv: add virtual x2apic support) disable virtual x2apic mode >>> completely if w/o APICv, and the author also told me that windows guest >>> can't enter into x2apic mode when he developed the APICv feature several >>> years ago. However, it is not truth currently, Interrupt Remapping and >>> vIOMMU is added to qemu and the developers from Intel test windows 8 can >>> work in x2apic mode w/ Interrupt Remapping enabled recently. >>> >>> This patch enables TPR shadow for virtual x2apic mode to boost >>> windows guest in x2apic mode even if w/o APICv. >>> >>> Can pass the kvm-unit-test. >> >> Ok, now I see what you meant; this actually makes sense. I don't expect >> much speedup though, because Linux doesn't touch the TPR and Windows is >> likely going to use the Hyper-V APIC MSRs when APICv is disabled. For >> this reason I'm not sure if the patch is useful in practice. > > I agree with Paolo on the use case -- what configurations benefit from > this change? Old windows guest w/o Hyper-V synthetic interrupt support. > >> To test this patch, you have to run kvm-unit-tests with Hyper-V >> synthetic interrupt enabled. Did you do this? > > The patch is buggy. MSR bitmaps are global and we'd have a CVE if one > guests used synic (=> disabled apicv) and one didn't. > You'd want a new set of bitmaps and assign them in vmx_set_msr_bitmap() > (or completely rewrite our management).
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-09-14 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-09-14 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-09-15 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-09-15 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-09-19 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable MSR-BASED TPR shadow even if w/o APICv Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-09-15 08:40 +0200
csiph-web