Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1483542
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v3 11/22] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock hooks per process hierarchy |
| Date | 2016-09-14 20:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shnpT-4on-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <shcNP-6gS-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <shcNQ-6gS-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote: > A Landlock program will be triggered according to its subtype/origin > bitfield. The LANDLOCK_FLAG_ORIGIN_SECCOMP value will trigger the > Landlock program when a seccomp filter will return RET_LANDLOCK. > Moreover, it is possible to return a 16-bit cookie which will be > readable by the Landlock programs in its context. Are you envisioning that the filters will return RET_LANDLOCK most of the time or rarely? If it's most of the time, then maybe this could be simplified a bit by unconditionally calling the landlock filter and letting the landlock filter access a struct seccomp_data if needed. > > Only seccomp filters loaded from the same thread and before a Landlock > program can trigger it through LANDLOCK_FLAG_ORIGIN_SECCOMP. Multiple > Landlock programs can be triggered by one or more seccomp filters. This > way, each RET_LANDLOCK (with specific cookie) will trigger all the > allowed Landlock programs once. This interface seems somewhat awkward. Should we not have a way to atomicaly install a whole pile of landlock filters and associated seccomp filter all at once? --Andy
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC v3 11/22] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock hooks per process hierarchy Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> - 2016-09-14 09:30 +0200
Re: [RFC v3 11/22] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock hooks per process hierarchy Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-09-14 20:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v3 11/22] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock hooks per process hierarchy Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> - 2016-09-15 00:40 +0200
csiph-web