Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1483984
| From | Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping |
| Date | 2016-09-15 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shCoX-5Sc-63@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <phv0Z-1MF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <shjPk-27U-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <shzAK-46D-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 15/09/16 08:56, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Akashi,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:13:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> Could you please review my patch below?
>>> See also arm64 maintainer's comment:
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313712.html
>>
>> -ETIMEDOUT waiting for the kdgb folk to comment. Ppeople have reported
>> that this patch is required for kgdb to work correctly on arm64, so I'm
>> happy to merge it.
>
> I'm happy, too.
I'll keep an eye out and FWIW see if I can throw in a review. I'm not
really one of "kgdb folk" but did examine it fairly deeply in the early
stages of the FIQ/NMI work (and which has since stopped focussing on kgdb).
I have some equally elderly, albeit rather less critical, kdb patches
that I should have pushed harder for so I'm sympathetic here ;-)
Daniel.
>> However, as detailed in your comment log:
>>
>>> This patch
>>> (1) moves kgdb_disable_single_step() from 'c' command handling to single
>>> step handler.
>>> This makes sure that single stepping gets effective at every 's' command.
>>> Please note that, under the current implementation, single step bit in
>>> spsr, which is cleared by the first single stepping, will not be set
>>> again for the consecutive 's' commands because single step bit in mdscr
>>> is still kept on (that is, kernel_active_single_step() in
>>> kgdb_arch_handle_exception() is true).
>>> (2) re-implements kgdb_roundup_cpus() because the current implementation
>>> enabled interrupts naively. See below.
>>> (3) removes 'enable_dbg' in el1_dbg.
>>> Single step bit in mdscr is turned on in do_handle_exception()->
>>> kgdb_handle_expection() before returning to debugged context, and if
>>> debug exception is enabled in el1_dbg, we will see unexpected single-
>>> stepping in el1_dbg.
>>> Since v3.18, the following patch does the same:
>>> commit 1059c6bf8534 ("arm64: debug: don't re-enable debug exceptions
>>> on return from el1_dbg)
>>> (4) masks interrupts while single-stepping one instruction.
>>> If an interrupt is caught during processing a single-stepping, debug
>>> exception is unintentionally enabled by el1_irq's 'enable_dbg' before
>>> returning to debugged context.
>>> Thus, like in (2), we will see unexpected single-stepping in el1_irq.
>>
>> this patch is doing *far* too much in one go. Could you please repost it
>> as a series of self-contained fixes with clear commit messages, so I can
>> queue them and cc stable where appropriate?
>
> Sure, but I need to refresh my memory here.
>
> -Takahiro AKASHI
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Will
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-09-14 17:00 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2016-09-15 09:50 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> - 2016-09-15 12:50 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> - 2016-09-15 14:40 +0200
csiph-web