Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1482670
| From | "Pan, Harry" <harry.pan@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/rapl: Enable Baytrail/Braswell RAPL support |
| Date | 2016-09-13 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sgZQC-4ZB-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sg5ln-1V3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sg5ln-1V3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sgWg1-2C0-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 15:41 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Harry Pan wrote: > > This patch also enables multiple quirks. > > This patch adds a single quirk for Baytrail. > > Please stop sending out patches 5 seconds after a review. Take your time Definitely I take this seriously because I felt awkward as well. > > + /* > > + * Some Atom processors (BYT/BSW) have 2^ESU microjoules > > + * increment, refer to Software Developers' Manual, Vol. 3C, > > + * Order No. 325384, Table 35-8 of MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT. > > + * > > + * TODO: In order to fit BYT/BSW quirk model, here remind > > + * this generates timer rate in 80ms; by default > > + * ESU of BYT/BSW is 5, so it leads (1000/200)*2^4. > > This sentence is not a sentence and I can't make any sense of it at > all. > > What's the TODO here? And why is that TODO not addressed in this patch? > I reviewed my sentence and agreed your comment; yes, it is incorrect to be a "TODO" tag since no decent suggestion/option. This things is because of the Baytrail/Braswell quirk breaks original assumption of perf RAPL polling timer rate calculation regarding of counter overflow case based on 200W; in short, it leads every 80ms system triggers an event to read counters, and this is concern I want to comment (wrong tag?) because I could no assess any side effect. Perhaps I should revise it as "remark" or "caveat" because I do not have decent suggestion (fulfill "TODO" tag) so far. Alternately, it shall not affect functionality since I compared w/ powercap driver through sysfs nodes during experiment, yet I am humble to take any advice to make this patch better. Sincerely, Harry
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/rapl: Enable Baytrail/Braswell RAPL support Harry Pan <harry.pan@intel.com> - 2016-09-11 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/rapl: Enable Baytrail/Braswell RAPL support Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-13 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/rapl: Enable Baytrail/Braswell RAPL support "Pan, Harry" <harry.pan@intel.com> - 2016-09-13 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/rapl: Enable Baytrail/Braswell RAPL support Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-14 18:20 +0200
csiph-web