Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1481847
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Question about suspend/resume clock handling in dwc3-of-simple.c |
| Date | 2016-09-12 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sgECu-7at-43@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi folks,
In dwc3-of-simple.c:dwc3_of_simple_remove(), I see the following code.
for (i = 0; i < simple->num_clocks; i++) {
clk_unprepare(simple->clks[i]);
clk_put(simple->clks[i]);
}
What I don't understand is why clk_unprepare() is called instead
of clk_disable_unprepare(). Someone told me that it was due to
dwc3_of_simple_runtime_suspend(), which would call clk_disable().
That doesn't really make sense to me, since after all CONFIG_PM
can be disabled.
Should it be clk_disable_unprepare(), or maybe something like the
following
if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
clk_disable_unprepare();
else
clk_unprepare();
or am I missing something ?
Thanks,
Guenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about suspend/resume clock handling in dwc3-of-simple.c Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-09-12 21:00 +0200
Re: Question about suspend/resume clock handling in dwc3-of-simple.c Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2016-09-12 21:10 +0200
Re: Question about suspend/resume clock handling in dwc3-of-simple.c Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-09-12 21:50 +0200
Re: Question about suspend/resume clock handling in dwc3-of-simple.c Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2016-09-13 07:40 +0200
Re: Question about suspend/resume clock handling in dwc3-of-simple.c Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-09-13 15:20 +0200
Re: Question about suspend/resume clock handling in dwc3-of-simple.c Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2016-09-13 16:10 +0200
csiph-web