Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1480008
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable |
| Date | 2016-09-09 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sfulP-3ra-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sfeTM-2z8-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfeTM-2z8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfoJs-8tz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:19:24PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > Also given many other syscalls take clockids and the backing logic > > isn't really getting removed (probably could cut the dynamic posix > > clocks core with the same conditional), I wonder if you could get a > > similar size win by taking a slightly more narrow cutting of the > > subsystem. That way you could preserve the more useful clock_gettime() > > functionality, but maybe stub out some of the less often used > > functionality. > > I want to support tinification, but I also doubt the utility of > removing clock_gettime() and clock_nanosleep(). I can't imagine ever > building a user space without those. In fact, thinking about IoT, > having good time is critical, and so these are the *last* functions I > would remove when downsizing. gettimeofday() gives you microsecond resolution which is good enough for 99.9% of all problems. The only real downside is removing clock_nanosleep() because nanosleep() does not give you the ability to schedule timers on absolute time. Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 23:20 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-09-08 23:50 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-09-09 02:00 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-09-09 02:40 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-09-09 10:10 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-09 16:00 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-09 15:50 +0200
csiph-web