Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1479942
| From | luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() |
| Date | 2016-09-09 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sftg5-2OA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <sfpFw-zV-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfqUV-1ud-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfsWJ-2Il-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sft6p-2Lq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sftg5-2OA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 09:31:56 -0300 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/09/2016 09:24 AM, luca abeni wrote: > > Ok, but the task is still throttled, right? > > I see your point, but... it is important to keep the documentation sync > with the code, and the code/explanation can be simpler now... :-) I perfectly agree with this... My main point was that the word "throttled" should probably be used instead of "blocked", and that the term "reservation period" should not be used because it has not been defined... Then, the "since the remaining runtime goes to 0" part of my suggestion is wrong and the sentence should be rephrased in some other way. Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying? Thanks, Luca
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it> - 2016-09-08 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-09-09 09:50 +0200
[PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it> - 2016-09-09 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-09-09 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2016-09-09 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-09-09 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-09-09 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2016-09-09 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2016-09-09 14:40 +0200
[PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it> - 2016-09-09 10:50 +0200
[PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it> - 2016-09-09 19:50 +0200
[PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield() Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it> - 2016-09-09 19:50 +0200
[tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Document behavior of sched_yield() tip-bot for Tommaso Cucinotta <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-09-10 15:00 +0200
csiph-web